Аннотация: Who Are you, genius Grechushkin? The experimental essay - an attempt of a psychological reconstruction.
Who are you, genius Grechushkin? The experimental essay - an attempt of a psychological reconstruction.
I will not deny that for several days I tried to find additional biographical information about Igor Grechushkin on the Internet.
Personally, I am interested in genius man. But, apparently, the others havn't such interest ...
I have not found any new information. And if it's so, then I tried to follow the path of Conan Doyle and Sherlock Holmes.
If informed people write about a person (not necessarily Grechushkin) that he did not pay the captain and the sailors the salary, that he received payment for the carriage of the cargo, but did not deliver the cargo, that he didn't not spent means on maintaining the ship in proper condition, then what can you think about the first steps of such an abstract businessman?
In the fog of the initial business steps, several firms appear, unpaid wages, offended personnel, bank loans and problems with their returns, disgruntled business partners (goods delivered, payment was not received; an advance was paid, but goods were not delivered) ...
In some moment there will be too many dissatisfied people. Large wheels start to spin slightly. And they will hurt the energetic businessman a little.
He calculates the results of his activities and goes to the sunny island.
But on a sunny island, he does not live peacefully.
He is actively pursuing some kind of business operations in which a decent amounts of money are moving, but there is no generally useful result. On the contrary, debts are growing ...
Somewhere in the fog, figures could be seen.
First, those, who (in Russia) are in need of a skilled representative abroad.
Second, a hypothetical tutors. How could a provincial businessman gain the ability to maneuver so freely in international markets, in the legal systems of different countries?
Thinking like that, Conan Doyle and Sherlock Holmes drink coffee and smoke cigars ...
We return from abstract considerations and arguments to Grechushkin.
Life is diverse. There is a brilliant Grechushkin. There is a real life of a genius person.
But there are also beautiful explanations of life connoisseurs - the explanations about the simple-minded Don Quixotes in the open spaces of business, Don Quixotes, who is bravely challenging the judge. And then how it goes. It all depends on how the coin falls, on how the circumstances develop. No cheating, no debt....
'... The shipowner was more of an adventurer than a shipowner, which is a fairly frequent occurrence among private owners in this business, when a person bets on 1-2 profitable voyages, after which he either gets back on his feet or goes bankrupt. (...) The vessel would have safely delivered the cargo and everything would have been fine [the vessel was out of order and it was not provided with food]. But the ship owner was at the limit - he simply did not have the money to bring the ship to a state that satisfies port control [according to the captain, the owner received a million dollars for transportation; a million is not money?]. Port control is itself a corrupt office. Moreover - everywhere, all over the world, including in the "highly moral" developed countries. We have all the world's maritime legislation built against people who are trying to get on their feet by playing for high stakes [difficult for brave businessmen in our time]. The shipowner could do nothing: every day of downtime is a loss, moreover, several thousand dollars, at least. What was left for him? He just disappeared. He is not the first, not the last. " (https://sobesednik.ru/proisshestviya/20200806-sudovladelec-byl-avantyuristom?utm_source=yxnews&utm_medium=desktop&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fyandex.ru%2Fnews)
It so happened ... Don Quixote started his horse at a gallop, but he lost ...
An expert in law expresses his opinion.
'So, we have several actors: the owner of the ship (he is presumably the owner of the cargo), the owner of the saltpeter - it looks like this is the state itself that confiscated it, the owner of the warehouse where the saltpeter was stored, the company that performed the welding, an unknown person who owned the fireworks (if there were any).
(...)
The owner has the opportunity to shift responsibility to the custodian, if there was one and if he violated the conditions for the safe storage of an explosive substance. But for the victims it does not matter: they will have a direct claim for compensation for harm to the owner. The latter can then collect everything from the custodian by way of recourse.
(...)
As a result, a preliminary analysis of the situation shows that all the persons named at the beginning can be brought to justice, except for the owner of the vessel, from whom the cargo was confiscated.' (Https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/08/05/kto_otvetit_za_vzryv_v_bejrute__test_dlya_deliktnogo_prava)
In general, a real genius (we don't mean Grechushkin) pulls the strings, produces the performance. And the audience, naturally, does not see the strings and threads. She looks at the dolls and is overwhelmed with emotion. The audience is delighted ...
[MDCXV. The explosion in Beirut, the collapsed bridge in the Far East, the technical intelligentsia. Sketch of civilization. - August 5, 2020
MDCXIX. Seven - one. The explosion in Beirut and the experienced, skilled sea captain, who was deceived seven times, and who one time showed resistance and foresight. The sketch of civilization. - August 6, 2020
MDCXXII. Igor Grechushkin. A high-class manager from Khabarovsk who moved to Cyprus. The experimental essay - an attempt of a partial biographical reconstruction. - August 7, 2020]
August 8, 2020 23:49
Translation from Russian into English: August 9, 2020 08:42.
Владимир Владимирович Залесский 'Кто Вы, гений Гречушкин? Опыт психологической реконструкции'.